April 1, 2012
Free Energy technologies? Ismael Aviso updates
But even better fuel efficiency is a good thing.
http://ismaelwater.com - Healthy mineral water and magnetic bracelet. "Magnetic Therapy proven to boost the delivery of oxygen and mineral of Ismael Water into the body cell to power up the immune system and fast detoxification of the body."
We were told the official report would be coming in a week or two, but nothing came..., until now. I've suspected that their delay was due to their reticence in signing off on something that appears to violate known laws of physics.
Finally, we have gotten the official report from University of the Philippines Professor, Miguel T. Escoto, Jr., who yesterday provided to Aviso the "EV test (pdf) and Winch data and repulsion test data (xlsx) files", which we are making available here publicly for the first time. It was provided in response to the following email from Aviso:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, ismael aviso wrote:
> Prof. Scoto
> I want to know if you can send to my email the data test result of our
> repelling test. Monday I have a call conference with NASA scientist to
> discuss the equation I need.
This was in response to a story we published a few days ago: Aviso Requests Expert Help for Equation (PESN; October 13, 2011).
The tests by the Philippine Department of Science and Technology (DOST) of the electric vehicle (not of the repelling force, mentioned below) were held at the University of the Philippines, Department of Mechanical Engineering (UPME).
Here's the report, copied from the pdf.
PRELIMINARY TEST REPORT ON ISMAEL AVISO'S ELECTRIC VEHICLE
This report presents results of preliminary tests conducted as part of an investigation of Mr. Ismael Aviso's electric vehicle. The tests were conducted at the UPME Vehicle Research and Testing Laboratory (VRTL) on February 24, 2011. The tests, considered as exploratory only and a prelude to a more exhaustive examination, aimed to (a) perform an energy accounting of the electric vehicle when running at a specified steady state condition and (b) determine the range for a given battery charge. The energy accounting consisted of power measurement at the wheels using the chassis dynamometer and voltage-current measurements at the batteries.
Photo shows the two traction batteries and the converter
The electric vehicle uses two, 12 volt, 24 ampere-hour, Motolite battery These are connected in series to provide a traction power system voltage of 24 volts. The batteries are located at the rear of the vehicle. A current meter probe measures the battery current. It uses a hall-effect type of sensor and is clamped around the current carrying conductor. A differential voltage probe is used to measure the battery voltage. This is attached directly across the series connection. Both probes are connected to a two channel, 60MHZ HP digital oscilloscope for measurement readouts. The waveforms are recorded by camera.
During the tests, the electric vehicle was initially mounted on the chassis dynamometer and driven by Mr. Aviso. The electric vehicle was able to reach and maintain a steady speed of about 7 km/hr with no load. It was decided to run the vehicle under the maximum chassis dynamometer load (Newtons, watts) that will maintain a vehicle speed of 7 km/hr while power measurements from the chassis dynamometer and batteries at the rear of the vehicle are made. Mr. Aviso suggested that for comparison purposes, the electric vehicle be run first using power from the 220V AC, single phase, Meralco line together with an AC/DC transformer-rectifier assembly, after which, the vehicle was run on Aviso's power conversion system (with Meralco line disconnected), referred to here as "Aviso Tech". This suggestion was adopted and three (3) trials were conducted, each trial consisting of the vehicle running at 7 km/hr, maximum dynamometer load, power from Meralco line first, then shift to "Aviso Tech" as power source. Upon Mr. Aviso's request, a road test of the electric vehicle around the campus followed the trials above, after which, the electric vehicle was returned to the chassis dynamometer for a rundown test.
Early on during the road test, the vehicle slowed down while negotiating an uphill portion of Magsaysay Street, the vehicle started slowing down. According to Mr. Aviso, his assistant was monitoring two instruments at the time: the on-board current meter and the GPS tracking device that we added to track the test route. The traction current was supposed to be kept under 15 amps. The assistant, at that moment, was monitoring the GPS instrument, when smoke started coming out from the converter. He noticed that the current shot to 35 amps on the uphill incline, when this happened. The converter unit heated up rapidly upon exceeding the 15 ampere current limit. Since the system coils had overheated, the electric vehicle was stopped a while to cool them down before proceeding some more. It was decided to go back downhill and run along the flatter academic oval route. The electric vehicle stopped after running between 300 - 400 meters and was towed back to the VRTL. The rundown test was cancelled to avoid possible further damage to the electric vehicle as a result of the uphill road test incident.
However, the vehicle was again mounted on the chassis dynamometer to make measurements from two additional small batteries in front of the vehicle overlooked during the first three trials.
Photo shows the two auxiliary batteries and the DC traction motor
This set of batteries supplied power to the auxiliary system devices, like cooling fans and micro-controller unit that controls the DC to DC power converter. Mr. Aviso showed us the wiring close up. He explained "for safety, the voltage needed by the microcontroller board is only minimal, and the power from the rear batteries would damage the board, if he takes the power from them." Measurements on the front batteries, show roughly a power of about 18watts (12 volts at 1.5amps) and does not contribute to traction power. The converter was run long enough to make measurements of the average readings.
As the vehicle managed to run only at about 3 km/hr this time, only the voltage and current readings and waveforms from these additional batteries were taken. The waveforms obtained were different from the waveforms measured from the rear batteries in the previous three trials. The tests were terminated after these measurements.
Three test trials were conducted. Each trial consisted of running the vehicle for 10 minutes on the Meralco AC line voltage using an AC/DC transformer-rectifier assembly, after which, the vehicle was set to run on Aviso's power conversion system, referred to here as "Aviso Tech". The test results are tabulated below. The "Output Power" is the wheel power measured with the dynamometer. AC input power is (VA x pf) while input power from the battery is (Vave x Iave).
Comparison of the output power vs. the input power when running on Aviso Tech seems to indicate an "unaccounted for" source of power or energy responsible for the higher values of output power than input power. It is strongly recommended that a more detailed examination and testing of the Aviso electric vehicle be conducted to address this observation.
The graph below shows the voltage and current waveforms taken from the rear batteries during the chassis dynamometer tests.
Rear Battery test Waveforms
In addition to this self-charging electric car, Aviso has also invented a solid state electrical generator called the "MEG", a repulsive force technology used in a "Universal Motor", and recently an HHO producing technology. All of his technologies appear to operate by utilizing a core method of extracting energy from the ambient environment.
In addition to testing Aviso's electric vehicle, the DOST also tested Aviso's "repelling force" phenomenon. Professor, Miguel T. Escoto, Jr.'s email from yesterday also included those results.
The first numbers are for the control, averaging at 36.7% work/energy efficiency. The second numbers are of Aviso's repelling force mechanism, with a work/energy efficiency of 94.3%.
And here is an email that came in from Aviso later today:
From: ismael aviso
To: Sterling Allan ; [Hank] ; *** ; EScoto UP prof
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 4:01 PM [MST]
Subject: Big question re: Data test result of repelling force & E car.
The testing of D.O.E. between my repelling force & Winch type of pulling the 1 kilo up to 30feet , it took the conventional motor almost 10 second to lift. My repelling force just 1 second to reach 30Feet.
The Result difference is 36% with 11 watts consumption from the battery. efficiency from Conventional & my repelling is 94% efficiency.
Not much big difference of 34% eff. compared to 94% eff.
Now Some Engineer's duplicated or similar to my repelling force with the same speed of 1 second lifting 1 kilo to 30 feet required 3,700 joules. Here's the video link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2M3rzx6jtnk
My repelling force with same 30feet lifting a 1 kilo , but consumed only 85 Joules.
We have big difference result.
That is a big question , due to a big difference of Joules consumed with the same result of action ( 1 second speed & 30 feet of height ).
I talked already to some expert engineers. They said the way the Inter - agency Technical Evaluation committee headed by D.O.S.T. might not have been done exactly the right way, not going far enough, & some expert suggestion is to include a dynamo in the test.
Their question is what will be the application why we are doing this kind of test ? If the answer is to produce a Electrical power by means of turning a dynamo, it means it needs to include in the calculation the behavior or parameters of the dynamo in creating power.
If the application is to produce a power from turning the dynamo.. it required speed. It means more speed more power output & lesser speed means lesser power output.
They are suggesting to connect the winch cable with dynamo with same speed ( 10 seconds ) & check how much the power output can produce & compare with my repelling force with speed of 1 second with cable turning the dynamo.
They said, it can be calculated the proper way, using the original test data result. Just measure the shafting diameter of the Dynamo & turn it for 10 seconds with equivalent of 30 feet cable attach to the shafting & next using my repelling force with 1 second speed : 30 feet as well to turn the same dynamo, using a 30 feet cable wire & then measure a gain the dynamo output.
Or just simply wait to finish my on going repelling force mechanical set up & connect to the dynamo, run it & measure, then it will settle the issue once & for all.
FUELLESS CAR PROTOTYPE by ISMAEL MOTOR
« on: September 09, 2010, 05:50:07 AM »
Check it Out. Fuelless Motor Car.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2011, 05:28:54 AM by hartiberlin »
Free Energy - Freie Energie - energia libre - OverUnity.com
FUELLESS CAR PROTOTYPE by ISMAEL MOTOR
« on: September 09, 2010, 05:50:07 AM »
free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: FUELLESS CAR PROTOTYPE by ISMAEL MOTOR
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2011, 11:17:56 AM »
I got these supportive emails from Konehead ( Doug Konzen),
who is also working on overunity pulsemotors:
Douglas L. Konzen
here is Ismael Aviso's electic car - it runs on "nothing at all" (it loops) and uses a battery only as buffer
plus the car runs on a standard forklift motor ...I dont know if you know about it yet - here is the peswiki article whch has condensed all the public information on it fairly good:
he uses highvoltage resonating and "shorting" coils in the MEG and gets exponential power increase, maybe its similar to Tesla's electric car...but that antenna isnt really the way it works so much - the antenna is sort of a power-booster to it.
He did some tests of 600 reps of starting and stopping this car, and the battery doesnt go down and those forklift motors are amp-hogs.......its very amazing Ismaels MEG.....
Just tought I would give you heads-up on it...Ismael is good friend of mine we went to Sweden two summers ago to build electric car for SAAB but nothing happened they were going broke and what he does is very hard to believe to be true too...anyways you could put generator in place of car too, and have free energy home gensets easy enough.
Hopefully he will start producing some MEGs for public soon just thought I would let you know.
Basically how it works is he SHORTS coils at sinewave peaks, the coils collapse and rebound with huge voltage increase -then he shorts the peaks of the oscillations created and then you get the exponential power increase (nutshell description)...so instead of oscillations "fading out" the oscillations expand to huge increases in power - its non-reflective type of power increase too - rosens ramp the primary up in extra draw...
ciao Konehead (Doug Konzen)
you can post it on OU.com no problem
I know Ismael really well and he has told me how it works on telephone when he gives me his updates and progress...so
I know mabye 90% in general terms, and mabye 60% in "technical terms"
Ismael is a genius - he is microwave engineer and set up all the cell phone system in Saudi Arabia where he went to school.
He can write with his right hand , or his left hand, it doesnt matter so he is one of those guys with two brains going at once...
He uses some "inventions" of mine from my old konehead motors which I am proud of that he is using - these are "pickup winds" which are simply secondary winds wrapped around, behind, and inside, of the primary winds. (his "core" is actual an inner secondary coil! plus more windings behind and around the "primary" to pickup all the normally-wasted ambient magnetic flux)
Also Ismael has the "repelling force" technology, which I have witnessed in Sweden of demos for SAAB execs - this alone is really super amazing - he can shoot a 1 kilo object in air (a coil) 30 ft in under a second and he dows it with a 9V battery and he can do it 16 times over and over and the battery will only drop around .3 V.....when I saw this, I wanted to throw all my stuff away....he has been doing the repelling force for awhile - he has some you tube videos showing it. Basically it is a coil vs coil
N agains N and pulse is super high frequency resonating pulse of 7500VDC discharge....dont know how he does it really but doesnt use invertor and is cascading DC and pickup winds "recycle" power back to where it came from plus he does coil-shorting in it too "somehow"
So think about doing this repelling force with no moving parts - just slam a coil against another coil with that much force, and which requires hardly any power to do - (it is all very much resonating power too, in the repelling force - iron just nearby will throw the resonance off!!)
He made some attempts at motors powered by it, but things kept flying apart from so much power - he started concentrating on the MEG last year, with no moving parts, and it has made the "mechanically rotating" repelling force obsolete sort ot....
other things he does is that he uses bifilar winds like that famous Tesla patent and he takes out all the hundreds/thousands of harmonics produced from them - he says that most people dont realize what bifilars do - because the increased power is usually cancelled out but Ismale gathers it all up somehow....actually he went to "septfilar" winds lately - 6 wires instead of just two, and now he got much more power that way.
He told me if you realy understand the HUBBARD coils, that is sort of what he is doing in his MEG.
Ther real heart of system, is the "shorting of the coils" at their sinewave peaks - this is also one of my inventions/discoveries I did a few years ago - you can amplify the voltage in a regular generator coil around 20times more voltage doing this - it is REALLY SIMPLE - just use a switch (must be very low resistance like high-amperage mosfet or a few mosfets in paralell) and simply "touch" the coil leads together with this switch for say 2ms or so - and put FWBR AC legs across the coil and ZING - a cap on the DC side of bridge goes up in voltage X 20 just like that...."amps" remain the same.....the coil collapses, and "rebounds" with a vengeance is how I describe how it works...
Ismael took this a few steps further - and he shorts the coils 5 times during sinewave peak period - it is very interesting looking at scope at a shorted coil - it is like a Tesla spark gap as it creates oscillations/ringing and what Ismael does is short the PEAKS OF THE OSCILLATIONS CREATED with very quick and accurate switching....this is heart of his MEG system as far as I understand it, and where he gets all his power from the "ambient" you could say....so he gets X100 increase in power doing this from his initial primary-feed....
the gain is in VOLTAGE - and you cant put any resistance on the cap as itr fills - and also like mentioned the switching must be very low resistance....Ismale uses some IGBTs in the MEG - it is high voltage, high frequency....
it must have a "2-stage output" circuit, where the cap fills from shorting, then cap hits load while cap is disconnected from "source"...pretty simple also....
I will answer your quesitons below:
> Could I post this in my overunity.com forum ?
sure no problem
> Or could you post it ?
you can do it...
Have you tested it yourself ?
I helped Ismael do demos of his repelling-force power in Sweden two summers ago, so have witnessed it and have general knowledge how it works (the replling force tech) and it is very real and very amazing jsut that...
As for the MEG, I havent built one - it is way too complicated it needs special microproccesors for IBGT filtering and EMP cancellations in order to do the very fast frequencies the MEG works on - he hired team of top notch computer chip guys to do his special microproccesors - but I have tested the "shorting-the-coils tech" alot, and I know how good that works plus know that pikcup winds around primaries gathers all the "ambient" flux that is normally wasted....so those two things, and also backemf/recoil collection circuits too I know and have tested all that but I cant do the 7500VDC cap discharge in his repelling force tech (I assume alot this is his "primary" in his MEG too)
and I cant do the resonating-high frequency pulse to his repeliing force tech either.
that anntenae on his car I dont really think does all that much - it will do somethign, but the real power is in the resonance, the shorting coils exponenetila-power increase via 5 times at peak coil-shorting, the pickup winds, and all the HUBBARD coil-like tech in his MEG.
> Are you convinced that it works this way ?
yes - I've seen the repelling force, and have been following his MEG progress for the past year and it works just like described - in fact better than you think, since it is so amazing, nobody believes it! I asked him what is the "ratio" of power increase, if you have like 100W system, and you put the MEG "onto" it, just so I could tell people, and he said it is 1000 times more power - and I said come on Ismael you have to tell something to people they will believe!! So just for fun I say it is 100times increase in power - but it is really way more than that....the doing the math on his older repelling force tech - it comes to about 1200HP blasts from a 9V battery 16 times....which is ridiculous nobody believes it...Hector thought there was rocket fuel in the videos and it was fake!
> The videos are pretty amazing...
Yes - the battery is a BUFFER actually in way to connect high voltage power to lower voltage -
he uses no invertor but something else is going on - so the battery is-not the "power source" but you got to give something people understand so the battery is in there...you can imagine how much power it takes to run a forklift motor - and battery goes up while he is running it....
they did 600reps of starting car form stop battery stayed at 13V
His MEG when it puts out power has already gathered-up all the backemf and plasma then will destroy brushes in the switching - so he runs that forklift motor on very high voltage and very low amps which is also amazing thing too....he has recent video of this - looking at the brushes in his forklift motor and there si no plasma at all >
> So how does he extract the power from the shorted coils ?
Like described above - at least that is how I do it - he does something very similar but needs very low resistance switch, and no resistance in the caps and must have a two-stage circuit...his MEG is very complicated to me cant really say exacty what he does in extraction of the coil-shorting he does at high voltage and high frequencies but it works I can talk about this stuff forever he has told me lots about it.
> Does he use some kind of transformer hooked up to it ?
No - no invertor and doesnt step-down the voltage to the motor either - it is very "clean" power hitting the forklift motor as described.
> So does this violate Lentz law ?
Yes in that the extra-power gained in the "coil shorting" 5 times at sinewave peak is "non-reflective" to the primary.
I use the coil-shorting tech in my latest Muller-type generators, and with two stage output and "AC series cap" in circuit (like Tesla does with his "resonator caps" in his spark gap stuff) I can get power output form my aircored generator coils, (induced by neodymium magnets in rotor like Muller) to be "non-reflective" to the motor input.....which is "lenz-buster"
Ismael told me that the 5 times at peaks coil shorting does not affect the primary to any extra draw too, and he uses the "AC series caps too, which worked like "high bypass filters" really, in that the 'lug" is blocked" but the high end stuff goes through and fills caps up with no-reflection...I could go into more details on this but this is good enough for now....
> BTW, what happened to your own pulse motors ?
I started doing Muller motors with very strong neodymiums, and started doing lots of AC rotovertors...best thing that happened with the old konehead pulse motors, is that Ismael took it and expanded it into what he has now...Ismael was one of the first people to replicate one of my konehad motors long ago and got it to work great (overunity) - then he incorporated the shorting coils into them too - ( I just did this with generator coils in Muller generators) then he got the repelling force tech going (with pickup winds which were from konehee motors) and then went onto the MEG>
> Any progress ?
Doing some good motor-generators right now seem to be 8 times overunity sold a unit to someone in florida but my stuff is like toys compared to Ismaels tech....>
> Many thanks again and keep up the great work.
you too overunity.com is great thing going on!
I am going to replicate Anton HHO tech soon - my friend has reactors, I modified motor already...
Here is cirucit I use for coil-shorting....what Ismael does is "somewhat" similar to it...note the AC cap in series off the FWBR...this is what make it "non reflective" to motor draw:
Here is my site-lots of rotovertors and muller-type generators on their axles
Robert Myrland in Norway has some LOOPING "rotovertor-Mullers" he uses hiperco cores with needle-point design - he is doing some small scale produciton right now like 2 or 3 a month - i might help him make some in may....
Here is the thing I made this summer for cusotomero - an "uperight motor-generator" that uses coil shorting in the generator coils - runs on 5W and puts out about 40W (that is nothing compared to Ismaels stuff!)